<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Handbook of Economic Growth | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/journal/handbook-of-economic-growth/</link><description>Handbook of Economic Growth</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/journal/handbook-of-economic-growth/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Growth and Ideas</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/growth-and-ideas/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/growth-and-ideas/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This Handbook of Economic Growth survey chapter lays out why treating ideas &amp;ndash; nonrivalrous instructions or recipes, as distinct from the rivalrous &amp;ldquo;objects&amp;rdquo; that embody them &amp;ndash; as a distinct input to production has deep implications for growth theory, captured in the chapter&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;Idea Diagram&amp;rdquo;: ideas imply nonrivalry, nonrivalry implies increasing returns to scale, and increasing returns imply that a standard perfectly competitive equilibrium cannot decentralize the optimal allocation of resources. Working through a simple toy model and then a richer model with physical capital, human capital, and a Dixit-Stiglitz variety structure, the chapter shows that, along a balanced growth path, per-capita output depends on the economy&amp;rsquo;s total (not per-capita) stock of ideas, so that the long-run growth rate of output per person is proportional to the growth rate of the number of researchers &amp;ndash; which, in the long run, is tied to the population growth rate &amp;ndash; with the factor of proportionality measuring the economy&amp;rsquo;s overall degree of increasing returns. The chapter argues at length that the &amp;ldquo;strong&amp;rdquo; scale effects of the first-generation models of Romer (1990), Aghion-Howitt (1992), and Grossman-Helpman (1991) &amp;ndash; in which the growth rate itself rises with population size &amp;ndash; are empirically rejected by the long-run stability of U.S. growth rates alongside large increases in research effort, and that the &amp;ldquo;weak&amp;rdquo; scale effects of later semi-endogenous growth models (in which only the level, not the growth rate, of income depends on scale) are the correct and in fact unavoidable implication of nonrivalry, supported by cross-country trade-controlled evidence and by models of growth over the very long run. The chapter also reports that growth accounting attributes only about 20 percent of post-war U.S. growth to the scale effect itself, with the remaining 80 percent coming from transition dynamics in educational attainment and world R&amp;amp;D intensity, and uses a &amp;ldquo;linearity critique&amp;rdquo; to argue that locating the economy&amp;rsquo;s required knife-edge linear differential equation in the population growth equation, rather than in a capital or human-capital accumulation equation, is the most defensible modeling choice.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>