<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Yi Wen | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/yi-wen/</link><description>Yi Wen</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/yi-wen/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Ramsey steady-state conundrum in heterogeneous-agent economies</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/the-ramsey-steady-state-conundrum-in-heterogeneous-agent-economies/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/the-ramsey-steady-state-conundrum-in-heterogeneous-agent-economies/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When macroeconomists solve for optimal capital and labor taxation in Aiyagari-style heterogeneous-agent, incomplete-markets economies, they routinely assume &amp;ndash; without proving it &amp;ndash; that the long-run &amp;ldquo;Ramsey steady state&amp;rdquo; exists and is well-behaved (interior), a step Aiyagari (1995) himself admitted was hard to justify. This paper proves that assumption is generally false in the standard Aiyagari model with constant-relative-risk-aversion preferences: for the empirically normal case of risk aversion sigma &amp;gt;= 1, no interior Ramsey steady state exists at all, and the only steady state the Ramsey planner can reach has aggregate consumption collapsing to zero and the labor tax rising to 100%, because the planner has a permanent incentive to borrow cheaply against a market interest rate that sits below the household discount rate, front-loading consumption until public debt becomes unsustainable. Using a modified, analytically tractable version of the Aiyagari model that nests the standard model as a limiting case, the authors then show that when an interior steady state does exist (under a feasibility condition on public debt capacity), it features a zero long-run capital tax &amp;ndash; the opposite of Aiyagari&amp;rsquo;s celebrated positive-capital-tax result &amp;ndash; with the modified golden rule instead satisfied purely through a high steady-state labor tax and public debt; for the alternative low-risk-aversion case (sigma &amp;lt; 1), an interior steady state can exist but only with a divergent Ramsey multiplier and a violation of the modified golden rule. The paper&amp;rsquo;s conclusions rest on a standard incomplete-markets model with CRRA power utility, ad hoc borrowing constraints, and a Ramsey planner maximizing time-zero discounted welfare; the authors are explicit that their results do not apply to Ramsey plans that instead maximize only steady-state welfare, where the incentive to front-load consumption disappears.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>