<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Xavier Vives | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/xavier-vives/</link><description>Xavier Vives</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/xavier-vives/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Market Opacity and Fragility: Why Liquidity Evaporates When It Is Most Needed</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/market-opacity-and-fragility-why-liquidity-evaporates-when-it-is-most-needed/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/market-opacity-and-fragility-why-liquidity-evaporates-when-it-is-most-needed/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Research question and motivation: The paper asks why market liquidity sometimes behaves in a stabilizing way (an illiquidity hike curbs liquidity demand and attracts liquidity supply) but on other occasions &amp;ldquo;evaporates when it is most needed,&amp;rdquo; degenerating into a disorderly run for the exit and a flash crash, often with no fundamentals news. Motivated by flash events (the May 6, 2010 US flash crash where the Dow Jones fell about 9% intraday; the October 15, 2014 Treasury crash; the August 24/25, 2015 ETF freeze; the 1987 crash; and the COVID-19 Treasury market dislocation), Cespa and Vives argue that lack of transparency about order flow is a key ingredient that can jam the &amp;ldquo;rationing&amp;rdquo; function of the cost of trading.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>