<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Toni M Whited | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/toni-m-whited/</link><description>Toni M Whited</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/toni-m-whited/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Taxes Depress Corporate Borrowing: Evidence from Private Firms</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/taxes-depress-corporate-borrowing-evidence-from-private-firms/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/taxes-depress-corporate-borrowing-evidence-from-private-firms/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research Question&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does corporate income taxation raise or lower corporate leverage? The canonical Modigliani-Miller (1963) view holds that the interest tax deduction makes debt more attractive, predicting a positive taxes-to-leverage relationship. Most prior empirical work using large public firms confirms this prediction. This paper re-examines the question using data on small private U.S. firms and finds the opposite: higher corporate taxes &lt;em&gt;depress&lt;/em&gt; leverage, at least for small, financially constrained private firms.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>