<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Thomas Sampson | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/thomas-sampson/</link><description>Thomas Sampson</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/thomas-sampson/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Import Liberalization as Export Destruction? Evidence from the United States</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/import-liberalization-as-export-destruction-evidence-from-the-united-states/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/import-liberalization-as-export-destruction-evidence-from-the-united-states/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research question and motivation.&lt;/strong&gt; How does import liberalization affect a country&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;export&lt;/em&gt; performance and welfare? Economic theory (Graham 1923, Ethier 1982, Krugman 1984) shows the answer hinges on whether production exhibits increasing returns to scale at the sector level. Krugman (1984) argued that with scale economies, import protection can be export-promoting because a protected industry expands, exploits scale economies, becomes more productive, and exports more — so conversely import liberalization is &amp;ldquo;export destroying.&amp;rdquo; The paper turns this logic into an empirical test: the sign of the import-liberalization-to-export relationship discriminates between constant-returns and increasing-returns trade models. Researchers otherwise lack tools to choose between these model classes, yet the choice matters greatly for multi-sector trade policy analysis.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>