<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tancredi Rapone | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/tancredi-rapone/</link><description>Tancredi Rapone</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/tancredi-rapone/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Firm dynamics, monopsony, and aggregate productivity differences</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/firm-dynamics-monopsony-and-aggregate-productivity-differences/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/firm-dynamics-monopsony-and-aggregate-productivity-differences/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research question and motivation.&lt;/strong&gt; Firms are larger and grow faster over the life cycle in high-income countries, while labor markets in poorer countries are less competitive (employers hold more wage-setting power). The paper asks how important employer labor market power (monopsony) is for explaining cross-country differences in firm dynamics and aggregate productivity. The novelty is that beyond the standard static misallocation-of-workers channel, monopsony also distorts &lt;em&gt;selection into entrepreneurship&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;productivity-enhancing technology adoption&lt;/em&gt;, potentially making the losses larger than prior static estimates suggest.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>