<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/stijn-van-nieuwerburgh/</link><description>Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/stijn-van-nieuwerburgh/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Exorbitant Privilege Gained and Lost: Fiscal Implications</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/exorbitant-privilege-gained-and-lost-fiscal-implications/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/exorbitant-privilege-gained-and-lost-fiscal-implications/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper studies three centuries of U.K. fiscal history to understand the fiscal implications of safe asset supplier status — what the authors call &amp;ldquo;exorbitant privilege&amp;rdquo; — and how it can be gained and lost. Using the discounted cash flow approach to fiscal capacity developed in Jiang, Lustig, Van Nieuwerburgh, and Xiaolan (2019), the paper measures the present discounted value of expected future primary surpluses (inclusive of convenience yield seigniorage) and compares it to the observed market value of outstanding government debt. The central finding is a sharp historical discontinuity: before World War I, when the U.K. was the world&amp;rsquo;s dominant safe asset supplier and its gilts served as the global reserve asset, roughly only three-quarters of U.K. debt was backed by future surpluses even after accounting for convenience yields earned from global safe asset demand. After World War II, when the U.K. lost its safe asset supplier status to the U.S., the U.K.&amp;rsquo;s debt became fully backed by surpluses and fiscal capacity became closely tied to its own macro fundamentals. By contrast, the U.S. after World War II shows a pattern similar to the pre-war U.K. but more extreme: less than one-third of outstanding U.S. Treasury debt is backed by future surpluses according to the paper&amp;rsquo;s estimates, with the gap between debt and estimated fiscal capacity growing sharply over recent decades.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rent Guarantee Insurance</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/rent-guarantee-insurance/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/rent-guarantee-insurance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Abramson and Van Nieuwerburgh study Rent Guarantee Insurance (RGI), a product in which an insurer pays the landlord on behalf of a tenant who defaults on rent due to a negative income or health expenditure shock, in exchange for a monthly premium proportional to rent. The central question is whether RGI can be designed to be both welfare-improving and financially viable, given the frictions of moral hazard and adverse selection.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>