<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sebastian Giesen | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/sebastian-giesen/</link><description>Sebastian Giesen</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/sebastian-giesen/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Interest Rate Pegs and the Reversal Puzzle: On the Role of Anticipation</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/interest-rate-pegs-and-the-reversal-puzzle-on-the-role-of-anticipation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/interest-rate-pegs-and-the-reversal-puzzle-on-the-role-of-anticipation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper revisits the &amp;ldquo;reversal puzzle&amp;rdquo; — the counterintuitive result, first documented by Carlstrom, Fuerst and Paustian (CFP, 2015), that in standard New Keynesian models the effect of forward guidance (technically implemented as a perfectly anticipated interest rate peg) can switch from expansionary to contractionary as the duration of the peg increases. The authors&amp;rsquo; central claim is that the appearance of the puzzle hinges on agents&amp;rsquo; degree of anticipation of the peg, and they examine three polar/intermediate cases: perfect anticipation, no anticipation, and imperfect anticipation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>