<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rune Vejlin | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/rune-vejlin/</link><description>Rune Vejlin</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/rune-vejlin/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Corrigendum to "Job Ladders by Firm Wage and Productivity" [Review of Economic Dynamics 58C (2025) 101307]</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/corrigendum-to-job-ladders-by-firm-wage-and-productivity-review-of-economic-dynamics-58c-2025-101307/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/corrigendum-to-job-ladders-by-firm-wage-and-productivity-review-of-economic-dynamics-58c-2025-101307/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Research question and motivation. On-the-job search models typically organize firms along a &amp;ldquo;job ladder&amp;rdquo; — a common ranking by workers of available jobs — but they disagree on whether the rung is best captured by a firm&amp;rsquo;s average wage or its productivity, and empirical guidance has been scarce. Bertheau and Vejlin ask: (i) Is average wage or productivity the better empirical measure of a firm&amp;rsquo;s location on the job ladder? (ii) How does job creation across these ladders vary in the cross-section and over the business cycle? (iii) Do recessions slow reallocation into better firms (a &amp;ldquo;sullying&amp;rdquo; effect) or speed it up (a &amp;ldquo;cleansing&amp;rdquo; effect)? This matters for models of aggregate labor-market fluctuations and any imperfect-labor-market model that assumes some jobs are more desirable than others.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>