<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pol Campos-Mercade | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/pol-campos-mercade/</link><description>Pol Campos-Mercade</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/pol-campos-mercade/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>De Gustibus and Disputes about Reference Dependence</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/de-gustibus-and-disputes-about-reference-dependence/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/de-gustibus-and-disputes-about-reference-dependence/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper examines whether heterogeneity in individual gain-loss attitudes — the degree to which people weigh losses more or less severely than equivalent gains — contaminates prior tests of expectations-based reference dependence (EBRD). The central question is: do prior experiments that appear to yield mixed or null evidence against EBRD actually reflect a failure of the expectations-based reference point, or instead reflect a methodological flaw — the implicit assumption that all individuals are uniformly loss averse?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>