<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Nobuhiro Kiyotaki | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/nobuhiro-kiyotaki/</link><description>Nobuhiro Kiyotaki</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/nobuhiro-kiyotaki/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>On Money as a Medium of Exchange</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/on-money-as-a-medium-of-exchange/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/on-money-as-a-medium-of-exchange/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This 1989 &lt;em&gt;Journal of Political Economy&lt;/em&gt; paper by Nobuhiro Kiyotaki and Randall Wright builds a general-equilibrium random-matching model in which the identity of &amp;ldquo;money&amp;rdquo; is determined endogenously, rather than assumed, by solving for which commodities agents actually choose to accept in trade. Three types of infinitely-lived agents, each specialized in producing one good and consuming another, meet in random bilateral pairs each period and can only trade quid pro quo (no credit); the paper exhaustively characterizes every steady-state pure-strategy Nash equilibrium of this economy under two different consumption-production patterns, finding that, depending on relative storage costs, either a single low-storage-cost good becomes the unique commodity money or two different goods simultaneously circulate as media of exchange, with some multiple-equilibrium cases in which the outcome depends on extrinsic belief alone rather than on storage costs. The paper also constructs steady-state equilibria in which an intrinsically useless object (&amp;ldquo;fiat money&amp;rdquo;) circulates as the economy&amp;rsquo;s general medium of exchange provided everyone believes others will accept it, a self-fulfilling-prophecy property the authors call &amp;ldquo;tenuous,&amp;rdquo; and such fiat-money equilibria can coexist with leftover commodity money. On welfare, the decentralized trading equilibria are not generally Pareto optimal, multiple equilibria generally cannot be Pareto-ranked against one another, and introducing fiat currency into a commodity-money economy can (for some, not all, parameter values) raise welfare unambiguously, although too much fiat money in circulation is always welfare-reducing. Finally, standard &amp;ldquo;moneyness&amp;rdquo; indicators are shown to behave in counterintuitive ways: velocity of circulation turns out to be a poor indicator of which goods are actually serving as money, while acceptability and a liquidity measure (expected time to reach one&amp;rsquo;s consumption good) track the medium-of-exchange role much better.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>