<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Noah Williams | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/noah-williams/</link><description>Noah Williams</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/noah-williams/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Learning Model of Financial Instability</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/a-learning-model-of-financial-instability/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/a-learning-model-of-financial-instability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Research question and motivation: Williams asks whether the recurrent boom-bust dynamics of Minsky&amp;rsquo;s financial instability hypothesis — &amp;ldquo;periods of stability lead to periods of instability&amp;rdquo; — can arise endogenously from a tractable rational-agent model in which investors learn about asset returns. This matters because standard rational-expectations asset-pricing models cannot generate the high, volatile price-dividend ratios, sizeable risk premia, and recurrent crashes seen in data, and because Minsky&amp;rsquo;s narrative has long lacked a clean formal mechanism. The paper&amp;rsquo;s main contribution is theoretical (a new instability/limit-cycle result for adaptive learning), with a secondary quantitative exercise.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>