<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Nicholas Kozeniauskas | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/nicholas-kozeniauskas/</link><description>Nicholas Kozeniauskas</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/nicholas-kozeniauskas/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What's driving the decline in entrepreneurship?</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/whats-driving-the-decline-in-entrepreneurship/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/whats-driving-the-decline-in-entrepreneurship/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The entrepreneurship rate in the United States—defined as the share of the labor force who own and actively manage a business with at least ten employees—declined by 26% between 1987 and 2015, a decline mirrored in the firm entry rate and not explained by compositional changes in the economy or driven by a small number of sectors. This paper addresses what caused this broad-based decline using Current Population Survey data, two new empirical facts, and a dynamic general equilibrium model of occupational choice. The first new fact is that the decline was larger for higher-education groups (35% for those with more than a college degree versus 2.4% for those without a high-school diploma), indicating that the driving force is not skill-neutral. The second new fact is that the size distribution of entrepreneur firms has been stable, so the entrepreneurship decline represents a shrinkage of the entrepreneurial sector relative to the economy. Estimating the contribution of four candidate explanations—skill-biased technical change (SBTC), increasing regulation, technology-driven increases in fixed and entry costs, and technology-driven productivity advantages for large firms—the paper finds that increasing entry costs account for most of the decline in both the entrepreneurship share and the firm entry rate, with empirical evidence pointing to both regulation and technology as sources of these higher costs.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>