<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Michela Giorcelli | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/michela-giorcelli/</link><description>Michela Giorcelli</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/michela-giorcelli/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Technology Transfer and Early Industrial Development: Evidence from the Sino-Soviet Alliance</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/technology-transfer-and-early-industrial-development-evidence-from-the-sino-soviet-alliance/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/technology-transfer-and-early-industrial-development-evidence-from-the-sino-soviet-alliance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper estimates the causal effect of technology and knowledge transfers on early industrial development using the Sino-Soviet Alliance of the 1950s as a natural experiment. Between 1950 and 1957, the Soviet Union supported the &amp;ldquo;156 Projects&amp;rdquo; — 139 approved civil projects for constructing technologically advanced, large-scale, capital-intensive industrial facilities in China. The intended program comprised two components: a &amp;ldquo;basic&amp;rdquo; transfer of Soviet state-of-the-art machinery and equipment (including blueprints, site surveys, and plant construction assistance), and an &amp;ldquo;advanced&amp;rdquo; know-how transfer involving Soviet experts residing in Chinese plants for roughly three years to train engineers and production supervisors in organizational, technological, and planning methods. Total investment amounted to approximately $80 billion in 2020 figures (45.7% of Chinese GDP in 1949).&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>