<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mar Reguant | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/mar-reguant/</link><description>Mar Reguant</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/mar-reguant/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Energy Transitions in Regulated Markets</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/energy-transitions-in-regulated-markets/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/energy-transitions-in-regulated-markets/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper asks how rate-of-return (RoR) regulation in U.S. electricity markets affects the speed and efficiency of energy transitions, specifically the transition from coal to combined-cycle natural gas (CCNG) generation driven by fracking-induced cost declines. The authors build and estimate a structural model of regulated utility behavior in which utilities optimize investment, retirement, and hourly operations decisions against an incentive structure set by state Public Utility Commissions (PUCs).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The regulatory environment combines two instruments: (1) an allowable rate of return that is decreasing in consumer electricity rates (incentive regulation), parameterized as s = (r/r₀)^{-γ}, where higher γ penalizes high-cost outcomes more severely; and (2) a &amp;ldquo;used-and-useful&amp;rdquo; standard in which a coal plant&amp;rsquo;s contribution to the rate base depends on its capacity utilization via a logit function. These two instruments create a tension: utilities want to lower costs to earn a higher RoR, but also want to run existing coal plants—even when uneconomical—to prove they are &amp;ldquo;used and useful&amp;rdquo; and thus maximize their rate base and profits.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>