<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Luis G. Hernández-Román | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/luis-g.-hernandez-roman/</link><description>Luis G. Hernández-Román</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/luis-g.-hernandez-roman/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Monetary policy trade-offs amid global supply chain disruptions</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/monetary-policy-trade-offs-amid-global-supply-chain-disruptions/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/monetary-policy-trade-offs-amid-global-supply-chain-disruptions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper employs a proxy structural VAR model to examine the effects of global supply chain (GSC) shocks on U.S. macroeconomic variables and the Federal Reserve&amp;rsquo;s historical response, and evaluates two counterfactual monetary policy rules using the COVID-19 episode. Large fiscal stimulus amplifies inflation while cushioning the output downturn from GSC shocks. Historically, the Fed adopted a loose stance, looking through price surges from supply chain disruptions. The first counterfactual—which stabilizes inflation—entails less accommodation and yields a more favorable inflation-output trade-off, reflecting greater price flexibility and limited output losses. The second counterfactual—which minimizes a dual-mandate loss function—calls for greater initial easing; under inflation targeting (IT) this involves moderate accommodation, while under average inflation targeting (AIT) the looser initial policy generates more persistent inflation and ultimately requires a contractionary response, worsening the trade-off.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>