<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Luís A.V. Catão | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/luis-a.v.-catao/</link><description>Luís A.V. Catão</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/luis-a.v.-catao/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Global Factors in Noncore Bank Funding and Exchange Rate Flexibility</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/global-factors-in-noncore-bank-funding-and-exchange-rate-flexibility/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/global-factors-in-noncore-bank-funding-and-exchange-rate-flexibility/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Research question and motivation: The paper asks how far global factors drive the foreign-borrowing component of advanced-economy banks&amp;rsquo; non-core funding, and whether exchange rate flexibility (and macroprudential policy) can insulate national banking systems from those global factors. This speaks to the long-running &amp;ldquo;trilemma vs. dilemma&amp;rdquo; debate (Rey 2015 vs. Mundell 1963; Miranda-Agrippino and Rey 2020) over whether a flexible exchange rate buys monetary/financial autonomy under open capital accounts. Non-core funding (funding other than deposits — repos, debt securities, foreign borrowing) matters because, per Shin and Shin (2011), Hahm et al. (2013) and Jorda et al. (2017), it is an elastic, crisis-predictive funding source closely tied to credit booms and leverage.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>