<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Kiminori Matsuyama | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/kiminori-matsuyama/</link><description>Kiminori Matsuyama</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/kiminori-matsuyama/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Competition and the Phillips curve</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/competition-and-the-phillips-curve/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/competition-and-the-phillips-curve/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Fujiwara and Matsuyama ask whether the well-documented flattening of the New Keynesian Phillips curve (NKPC) and the concurrent rise in market concentration and markup rates are causally linked or merely coincidental. Under the canonical New Keynesian model with CES demand, competition is irrelevant to the Phillips curve regardless of whether entry is endogenous — concentration neither changes its slope nor affects inflation directly. This paper overturns that irrelevance result by extending the canonical model in two directions: (1) incorporating endogenous firm entry and exit following Bilbiie, Ghironi, and Melitz (2008) and Bilbiie, Fujiwara, and Ghironi (2014), and (2) replacing CES with the Homothetic Single Aggregator (HSA) demand system (Matsuyama and Ushchev 2017, 2020b), a flexible, tractable class of homothetic demand systems that nests CES and Translog as special cases.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>