<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Jens H. E. Christensen | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/jens-h.-e.-christensen/</link><description>Jens H. E. Christensen</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/jens-h.-e.-christensen/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Passive Quantitative Easing: Bond Supply Effects through Lower Debt Issuance</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/passive-quantitative-easing-bond-supply-effects-through-lower-debt-issuance/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/passive-quantitative-easing-bond-supply-effects-through-lower-debt-issuance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper introduces the concept of &amp;ldquo;passive quantitative easing&amp;rdquo; (passive QE): a deliberate reduction in government debt issuance that lowers anticipated future bond supply and reduces long-term yields through the same supply channel as central bank asset purchases, without involving asset purchases or reserves creation. The authors develop a unified classification scheme for central bank balance sheet policies organized by their net effect on anticipated future bond supply, and show that the Danish government&amp;rsquo;s unexpected January 2015 debt halt — which removed approximately 29.9 billion DKK from the outstanding bond stock over roughly nine months — was followed by a two-day yield decline of approximately 25 basis points across the entire yield curve. Regression estimates controlling for concurrent ECB and SNB actions imply that the halt raised the safety premium on Danish bonds by 17–22 basis points and reduced the ten-year term premium by 37–70 basis points, with combined effects pointing to 54–92 basis points in lower yields relative to the counterfactual. The Danish episode ranks approximately on par with the Federal Reserve&amp;rsquo;s QE3 in the classification scheme, and the paper argues that passive QT — unexpectedly higher debt issuance — is contractionary through two additional portfolio balance channels not present in active QT and should be treated as an active policy tool rather than a neutral background condition.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>