<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Javier D Donna | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/javier-d-donna/</link><description>Javier D Donna</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/javier-d-donna/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Illiquidity of Water Markets</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/the-illiquidity-of-water-markets/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/the-illiquidity-of-water-markets/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Donna and Espín-Sánchez investigate whether a market (sequential English auction) or a non-market institution (fixed quota) more efficiently allocates an intermediate good — irrigation water — when some buyers are liquidity constrained. The setting is Mula, a city in southeastern Spain, where farmers used an unregulated water auction continuously from 1244 until August 1, 1966, when the institution was replaced by a fixed quota system. This 700-year natural experiment, combined with the fact that water demand for a given crop is pinned down by the crop&amp;rsquo;s production function rather than by farmer wealth, allows the authors to separately identify liquidity constraints from unobserved heterogeneity in productivity.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>