<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Jan De Loecker | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/jan-de-loecker/</link><description>Jan De Loecker</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/jan-de-loecker/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Manager Pay Inequality and Market Power</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/manager-pay-inequality-and-market-power/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/manager-pay-inequality-and-market-power/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper asks whether managers are paid for market power. Bao, De Loecker, and Eeckhout build a general equilibrium model in which firms compete oligopolistically in goods markets (following Atkeson and Burstein 2008) while managers are allocated to firms through a competitive matching market (following Gabaix and Landier 2008 and Tervio 2008). The model identifies two distinct channels through which market power and firm size jointly determine executive compensation: a market power channel, whereby a more productive firm charges a higher markup given its output level, and a firm size channel, whereby higher total factor productivity expands output given markups. Because manager ability and firm type are complementary inputs into TFP, assortative matching arises: high-ability managers sort into high-type firms, amplifying both productivity dispersion and markup dispersion across firms.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>