<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>J. R. Hicks | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/j.-r.-hicks/</link><description>J. R. Hicks</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/j.-r.-hicks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Mr. Keynes and the "Classics"; A Suggested Interpretation</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/mr.-keynes-and-the-classics-a-suggested-interpretation/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/mr.-keynes-and-the-classics-a-suggested-interpretation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper, written within a year of the publication of Keynes&amp;rsquo;s General Theory, asks how much of Keynes&amp;rsquo;s theory is genuinely new by building a small formal model of the &amp;ldquo;classical&amp;rdquo; theory of income and employment to serve as a basis of comparison, then reconstructing Keynes&amp;rsquo;s own theory in the same terms. Hicks shows that the classical system &amp;ndash; money demand proportional to income (the Cambridge equation), investment as a function of the interest rate, and saving determined jointly by income and the interest rate &amp;ndash; differs from Keynes&amp;rsquo;s system essentially in one respect: Keynes makes the demand for money depend on the interest rate as well as income (liquidity preference), a change Hicks judges &amp;ldquo;vital,&amp;rdquo; whereas dropping the interest rate from the saving function is &amp;ldquo;a mere simplification &amp;hellip; ultimately insignificant.&amp;rdquo; Reinstating income in the money-demand equation to get the full &amp;ldquo;General Theory&amp;rdquo; system, Hicks derives a diagram of two curves in income-interest-rate space &amp;ndash; one from the money market, one from the goods market &amp;ndash; whose intersection jointly determines income and the interest rate, the construction later known as the IS-LM model. Because Hicks argues there is a floor below which the interest rate cannot fall, the money-market curve is nearly flat at low levels of income; when the goods-market curve intersects it on that flat stretch, expanding the desire to invest raises income and employment but leaves the interest rate unmoved, which is Keynes&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;special theory&amp;rdquo; and, in Hicks&amp;rsquo;s words, makes &amp;ldquo;the General Theory of Employment &amp;hellip; the Economics of Depression&amp;rdquo;; away from that stretch, the classical-style result &amp;ndash; where more investment raises the interest rate too &amp;ndash; reasserts itself. A final section generalizes the apparatus further, letting income affect investment and the interest rate affect saving, and shows how the resulting system connects to Wicksell&amp;rsquo;s natural rate of interest, while Hicks explicitly flags that the concept of aggregate &amp;ldquo;Income&amp;rdquo; is being asked to do more analytical work than it can fully bear.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>