<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ivan Petrella | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/ivan-petrella/</link><description>Ivan Petrella</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/ivan-petrella/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Consumer durables and monetary policy according to HANK</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/consumer-durables-and-monetary-policy-according-to-hank/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/consumer-durables-and-monetary-policy-according-to-hank/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="research-question"&gt;Research Question&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consumer durables account for a disproportionately large share of household expenditure fluctuations despite their small share of total private consumption. Two stylized facts motivate the paper: (1) durable expenditure is far more interest-rate sensitive than nondurable expenditure following monetary policy shocks, and (2) durable and nondurable expenditures comove positively and persistently—both reaching trough in the same quarter. Standard two-sector New Keynesian models struggle to generate this positive conditional comovement because asymmetric sectoral price rigidity induces large relative-price movements that push the two sectors in opposite directions. This paper asks what model features are necessary and sufficient to reproduce both the sectoral comovement pattern and the hump-shaped aggregate dynamics observed in the data, and how the answer changes across households sorted by liquid asset holdings.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>