<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Isabel Cairó | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/isabel-cairo/</link><description>Isabel Cairó</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/isabel-cairo/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Labor Market Discrimination and the Racial Unemployment Gap: Can Monetary Policy Make a Difference?</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/labor-market-discrimination-and-the-racial-unemployment-gap-can-monetary-policy-make-a-difference/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/labor-market-discrimination-and-the-racial-unemployment-gap-can-monetary-policy-make-a-difference/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper addresses two connected questions: why do Black workers face persistently higher and more volatile unemployment than white workers, and can the Federal Reserve&amp;rsquo;s August 2020 shift from a symmetric &amp;ldquo;Deviations&amp;rdquo; rule to a &amp;ldquo;Shortfalls&amp;rdquo; rule narrow the resulting racial unemployment gap? The authors build a New Keynesian search and matching model with endogenous separations (Mortensen-Pissarides) and add employer taste-based discrimination, calibrated to U.S. Current Population Survey microdata from January 1976 to December 2019.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Evaluating macroeconomic outcomes under asymmetries: Expectations matter</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/evaluating-macroeconomic-outcomes-under-asymmetries-expectations-matter/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/evaluating-macroeconomic-outcomes-under-asymmetries-expectations-matter/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research Question&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This paper investigates whether and how assumptions about household and firm expectations alter the macroeconomic implications of asymmetries commonly embedded in macroeconomic models. Specifically, it asks: when a model features a nonlinearity — such as an asymmetric monetary policy rule or a nonlinear Phillips curve — do the longer-run average outcomes and the distributional properties of inflation and unemployment depend on whether agents have &lt;em&gt;rational expectations&lt;/em&gt; (RE, accounting for the possibility of future shocks) versus &lt;em&gt;perfect foresight&lt;/em&gt; (PF, not anticipating future shocks)?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>