<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Henrique S. Basso | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/henrique-s.-basso/</link><description>Henrique S. Basso</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/henrique-s.-basso/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Robot adoption and inflation dynamics</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/robot-adoption-and-inflation-dynamics/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/robot-adoption-and-inflation-dynamics/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="research-question"&gt;Research Question&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Basso and Rachedi investigate how robot adoption influences inflation dynamics — specifically, whether the surge in automation during the 2000s and 2010s can explain the muted sensitivity of inflation to unemployment (the &amp;ldquo;flat Phillips curve&amp;rdquo;) observed in advanced economies prior to the Covid pandemic, and whether the same framework can account for the subsequent resurgence of steep inflation-unemployment co-movement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id="data-and-methodology"&gt;Data and Methodology&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The empirical analysis uses an annual panel covering 384 U.S. metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) from 2008 to 2018. The dependent variables are non-tradable goods inflation (log-difference of services prices excluding rents and utilities, from BEA regional price parities) and wage inflation (log-difference of average compensation per job). Robot adoption at the MSA-year level is constructed following Acemoglu and Restrepo (2020a): industry-level robots per employee at the U.S. national level are weighted by industry employment shares in each MSA, yielding an MSA-year robot-per-employee ratio.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>