<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gabriel Ulyssea | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/gabriel-ulyssea/</link><description>Gabriel Ulyssea</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/gabriel-ulyssea/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Rural Migrants and Urban Informality: Evidence From Brazil</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/rural-migrants-and-urban-informality-evidence-from-brazil/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/rural-migrants-and-urban-informality-evidence-from-brazil/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research Question.&lt;/strong&gt; Does rural-urban migration increase or decrease urban informality, and through what mechanisms — and does the answer depend on the time horizon?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting and Data.&lt;/strong&gt; The paper studies internal migration in Brazil over 2000–2010. The empirical analysis combines: (i) two waves of the Decennial Population Census (2000 and 2010) covering working-age adults (ages 15–64) across 3,548 Minimum Comparable Areas (MCAs); (ii) the universe of formal firms and workers from the matched employer-employee administrative dataset RAIS (1997–2018); (iii) the ECINF informal firm survey (2003); and (iv) the annual National Household Survey (PNAD, 2001–2009) for year-on-year short-run analysis in 700 identifiable municipalities. Internal immigration to the average urban destination was large: 17.6 percent overall over the decade, 7 percent for state-to-state migration.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>