<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Frédéric Boissay | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/frederic-boissay/</link><description>Frédéric Boissay</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/frederic-boissay/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Monetary Policy and Endogenous Financial Crises</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/monetary-policy-and-endogenous-financial-crises/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/monetary-policy-and-endogenous-financial-crises/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper asks whether a central bank should deviate from strict inflation targeting (SIT) to promote financial stability, studying the question in a textbook New Keynesian model augmented with capital accumulation and microfounded endogenous credit-market crises. The model embeds two financial frictions — limited contract enforcement and asymmetric information about firm productivity — that together generate fragile credit markets in which, when productive firms&amp;rsquo; marginal return on capital falls below a threshold, the credit market collapses (a &amp;ldquo;financial crisis&amp;rdquo;). The calibrated model matches the empirical regularity that economies spend roughly 8% of time in financial crises. The central finding is threefold: (1) monetary policy affects crisis probability both in the short run (via output and markups) and in the medium run (via capital accumulation dynamics); (2) a Taylor-type rule that responds to output fluctuations — rather than SIT — reduces crisis incidence and raises welfare, with TR93 (φ_y = 0.125) generating a 0.016% permanent consumption equivalent gain over SIT; (3) prolonged unexpected monetary easing followed by abrupt tightening is itself a mechanism that can trigger financial crises. These findings imply a genuine price-versus-financial-stability tradeoff and challenge the &amp;ldquo;divine coincidence&amp;rdquo; view that SIT is sufficient in the presence of financial frictions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>