<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Enrico Spolaore | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/enrico-spolaore/</link><description>Enrico Spolaore</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/enrico-spolaore/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Barriers to Global Capital Allocation</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/barriers-to-global-capital-allocation/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/barriers-to-global-capital-allocation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research Question.&lt;/strong&gt; Why do observed international investment positions and cross-country differences in rates of return to capital fail to conform to a frictionless capital-market benchmark? The paper asks how large the efficiency and distributional costs of barriers to global capital allocation are, and which frictions — capital income taxes, political risk, and geographic/cultural/linguistic distances — matter most.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Model.&lt;/strong&gt; The authors develop a multi-country dynamic spatial general equilibrium model in which the entire network of bilateral cross-border investment positions is endogenously determined. Production in each country i follows a three-factor Cobb-Douglas function in reproducible capital, labor, and natural resources, with country-varying income shares. Capital is the only mobile factor. A logit asset demand system governs portfolio shares: the share of country j&amp;rsquo;s savings invested in country i is proportional to the risk-adjusted expected return on capital in i, scaled by the capital stock of i, and inversely proportional to a bilateral portfolio wedge ∆ij. These wedges can be microfounded via either rational inattention (where wedges reflect the precision of prior beliefs about returns) or extreme-value-distributed transaction costs. The model admits multiple microfoundations but yields the same functional form and the same counterfactual welfare calculations regardless of interpretation.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>