<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Donggyu Lee | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/donggyu-lee/</link><description>Donggyu Lee</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/donggyu-lee/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Unconventional Monetary Policies and Inequality</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/unconventional-monetary-policies-and-inequality/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/unconventional-monetary-policies-and-inequality/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper asks whether the Federal Reserve&amp;rsquo;s unconventional monetary policies (UMP) — specifically quantitative easing (QE) and forward guidance — exacerbated income and welfare inequality in the United States during the effective lower bound (ELB) episode following the Great Recession (2009–2015). The question is empirically and theoretically contested: QE raises profits and equity prices, benefiting wealthy households who hold most equity, while simultaneously reducing unemployment, which benefits poorer households who rely almost entirely on labor income. Resolving the net effect requires a unified framework that captures both channels simultaneously, with empirically realistic responses of profits, wages, and unemployment to monetary policy.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Income Inequality and Job Creation</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/income-inequality-and-job-creation/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/income-inequality-and-job-creation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper establishes a causal link from rising top income shares to reduced net job creation at small firms, working through a bank funding channel rooted in &lt;strong&gt;non-homothetic household portfolio allocation&lt;/strong&gt;: because high-income households hold a smaller fraction of financial wealth in bank deposits (less than one-fifth for the top decile versus two-thirds for the bottom quintile, per the Survey of Consumer Finance), a redistribution of income toward top earners shifts aggregate saving away from deposits toward stocks and bonds. Banks must raise deposit rates to retain funding, which passes through to loan rates; since small, informationally-opaque firms depend disproportionately on bank credit while large firms have direct capital-market access, higher loan rates compress small firms&amp;rsquo; net job creation relative to large firms. Using U.S. state-level panel data from 1981 to 2015, a shift-share instrumental variable, and a quantitative general equilibrium model, the paper documents this channel and finds it accounts for &lt;strong&gt;13% of the 4.97 percentage-point rise in large-firm employment share&lt;/strong&gt; and between &lt;strong&gt;7.5% and 15% of the decline in the labor share&lt;/strong&gt; since 1980.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>