<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Danny Yagan | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/danny-yagan/</link><description>Danny Yagan</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/danny-yagan/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Place-Based Redistribution</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/place-based-redistribution/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/place-based-redistribution/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research Question&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Should national governments redistribute income to residents of poor areas through place-based transfers, or should redistribution rely solely on place-blind (income-only) taxes? The longstanding view in urban economics—&amp;ldquo;help poor people, not poor places&amp;rdquo;—holds that place-based aid is inefficient because it channels activity to less productive locations. This paper challenges that view by formalizing the conditions under which place-based redistribution improves on purely income-based transfers, using tools from optimal tax theory embedded in a spatial equilibrium model.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>