<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Daniel Marcel Te Kaat | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/daniel-marcel-te-kaat/</link><description>Daniel Marcel Te Kaat</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/daniel-marcel-te-kaat/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Global Factors in Noncore Bank Funding and Exchange Rate Flexibility</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/global-factors-in-noncore-bank-funding-and-exchange-rate-flexibility/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/global-factors-in-noncore-bank-funding-and-exchange-rate-flexibility/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Research question and motivation: The paper asks how far global factors drive the foreign-borrowing component of advanced-economy banks&amp;rsquo; non-core funding, and whether exchange rate flexibility (and macroprudential policy) can insulate national banking systems from those global factors. This speaks to the long-running &amp;ldquo;trilemma vs. dilemma&amp;rdquo; debate (Rey 2015 vs. Mundell 1963; Miranda-Agrippino and Rey 2020) over whether a flexible exchange rate buys monetary/financial autonomy under open capital accounts. Non-core funding (funding other than deposits — repos, debt securities, foreign borrowing) matters because, per Shin and Shin (2011), Hahm et al. (2013) and Jorda et al. (2017), it is an elastic, crisis-predictive funding source closely tied to credit booms and leverage.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Housing Portfolio Channel of QE Transmission</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/a-housing-portfolio-channel-of-qe-transmission/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/a-housing-portfolio-channel-of-qe-transmission/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research Question&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This paper identifies and quantifies a &lt;em&gt;housing portfolio channel&lt;/em&gt; of quantitative easing (QE) transmission that operates through household portfolio rebalancing toward second homes (as opposed to the well-studied bank credit channel). The central question is whether, and how much, the ECB&amp;rsquo;s formal adoption of QE in January 2015 induced households with larger pre-existing bond holdings to shift wealth into residential real estate—specifically second homes held for investment—and what the downstream effects on regional housing market outcomes were.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>