<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Christopher Gust | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/christopher-gust/</link><description>Christopher Gust</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/christopher-gust/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Optimal monetary policy with uncertain private sector foresight</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/optimal-monetary-policy-with-uncertain-private-sector-foresight/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/optimal-monetary-policy-with-uncertain-private-sector-foresight/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Central banks must set policy under uncertainty about how private-sector expectations form, which changes how monetary policy transmits to output and inflation. This paper studies optimal time-consistent monetary policy using a New Keynesian finite-horizon planning (NK-FHP) model in which households and firms have limited foresight: they solve structural problems only up to a finite horizon, and update their beliefs about longer-run inflation by averaging over past data. In this setting—unlike in standard New Keynesian models—an &amp;ldquo;inflation scares&amp;rdquo; problem can arise: agents&amp;rsquo; longer-run inflation expectations can deviate persistently from the central bank&amp;rsquo;s target, generating costly and prolonged disinflations. The authors formally characterize optimal policy when the planning horizons of private-sector agents are uncertain and a risk of inflation scares is present, showing that risk-management considerations modify the standard &amp;ldquo;leaning against the wind&amp;rdquo; principle with a novel preemptive motive: the optimal policy responds more aggressively to the risk of unanchoring to prevent inflation scares from materializing. An estimated version of the model is used to quantify how much this preemptive motive mattered during the post-pandemic inflation surge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>