<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Christine Blandhol | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/christine-blandhol/</link><description>Christine Blandhol</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/christine-blandhol/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>When is TSLS Actually LATE?</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/when-is-tsls-actually-late/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/when-is-tsls-actually-late/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper asks: when does two-stage least squares (TSLS) with covariates actually estimate a local average treatment effect (LATE) — a non-negatively weighted average of causal effects for compliers only? The authors show that the answer is: almost never in practice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The paper&amp;rsquo;s central theoretical result (Theorem 1) is that a linear IV estimand is weakly causal — meaning it cannot have the wrong sign relative to all underlying treatment effects — if and only if the IV specification has &amp;ldquo;rich covariates,&amp;rdquo; defined as the condition that the linear projection of the instrument onto the covariates, L[Z|X], equals the true conditional mean E[Z|X] at every covariate value. Saturated specifications (nonparametric covariate control) always satisfy rich covariates. Outside of two special cases — saturated covariates or an instrument that is mean-independent of covariates — rich covariates is an implicit parametric assumption that can fail.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>