<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Charles I. Jones | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/charles-i.-jones/</link><description>Charles I. Jones</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/charles-i.-jones/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Population and Welfare: Measuring Growth when Life is Worth Living</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/population-and-welfare-measuring-growth-when-life-is-worth-living/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/population-and-welfare-measuring-growth-when-life-is-worth-living/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper asks how much economic progress looks different when one applies a total utilitarian welfare criterion — counting every person&amp;rsquo;s flow utility — rather than the standard per-capita consumption measure. The motivation is both philosophical and practical: philosophers have long debated whether the number of people matters for social welfare alongside average living standards, yet growth economists have almost exclusively used the per-capita approach. The authors do not adjudicate the debate; they quantify its stakes across a broad cross-country sample.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>