<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bledi Taska | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/bledi-taska/</link><description>Bledi Taska</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/bledi-taska/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Downward Rigidity in the Wage for New Hires</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/downward-rigidity-in-the-wage-for-new-hires/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/downward-rigidity-in-the-wage-for-new-hires/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Hazell and Taska use wages posted on online job vacancies — matched to job titles and establishment identifiers from Burning Glass Technologies — to measure the wage for new hires at the job level (same job title and establishment) over 2010Q1–2020Q2. They find that this measure of the wage for new hires is rigid downward and flexible upward. At the job level, the nominal posted wage changes infrequently — on average once every 5–6 quarters — and conditional on changing, is four times more likely to rise than to fall. In the cyclical dimension, job-level posted wages rise strongly when state unemployment falls but do not fall when state unemployment rises; real wages exhibit the same asymmetric pattern. These results do not appear in the average wage for new hires (which aggregates across all job types), because time-varying job composition inflates the variance of average wages and raises standard errors roughly twentyfold relative to job-level regressions — explaining why prior work using worker-level survey data found no evidence of downward rigidity. A Heckman (1979) selection correction for firms&amp;rsquo; selection into vacancy posting suggests that selection bias in the job-level regression is moderate. The findings provide direct empirical support for models in which downward wage rigidity for new hires — specifically at the job level — amplifies unemployment fluctuations and generates asymmetric unemployment dynamics.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>