<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Benjamin Born | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/benjamin-born/</link><description>Benjamin Born</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/benjamin-born/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Temporary VAT Cut as Unconventional Fiscal Policy</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/a-temporary-vat-cut-as-unconventional-fiscal-policy/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/a-temporary-vat-cut-as-unconventional-fiscal-policy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The paper studies Germany&amp;rsquo;s temporary 3 percentage-point VAT cut from July 1 to December 31, 2020 (standard rate 19%→16%, reduced rate 7%→5%), combining two causal identification strategies with microdata and a HANK model to establish that intertemporal substitution drove a large spending response concentrated in durable goods.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ex-ante approach&lt;/strong&gt; (July 2020 BOP-HH survey, fielded immediately after the cut took effect): The survey distinguishes households informed about the January 2021 reversal (treated) from those who believed the cut was permanent (control). Treated households are approximately &lt;strong&gt;10 percentage points more likely to increase durable purchases&lt;/strong&gt; on the extensive margin. This is a lower bound on the intertemporal substitution effect because some &amp;ldquo;control&amp;rdquo; households likely learned about the reversal before the survey, attenuating the control group&amp;rsquo;s spending behavior toward that of the treated group.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>