<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Anna Russo | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/anna-russo/</link><description>Anna Russo</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/anna-russo/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Additionality and Asymmetric Information in Environmental Markets: Evidence from Conservation Auctions</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/additionality-and-asymmetric-information-in-environmental-markets-evidence-from-conservation-auctions/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/additionality-and-asymmetric-information-in-environmental-markets-evidence-from-conservation-auctions/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper investigates the problem of additionality — the likelihood that a conservation action is marginal to (i.e., caused by) an incentive — in the United States Department of Agriculture&amp;rsquo;s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), one of the largest and most mature Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) mechanisms in the world. The CRP pays landowners $1.6–$1.8 billion per year under 10-year contracts to retire cropland and plant grass mixes, trees, or wildlife habitats, using a discriminatory scoring auction in which landowners submit bids on a menu of heterogeneous contracts ranked by a scoring rule.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>