<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Andrés Rodríguez-Clare | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/andres-rodriguez-clare/</link><description>Andrés Rodríguez-Clare</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/andres-rodriguez-clare/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Trade with Nominal Rigidities: Understanding the Unemployment and Welfare Effects of the China Shock</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/trade-with-nominal-rigidities-understanding-the-unemployment-and-welfare-effects-of-the-china-shock/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/trade-with-nominal-rigidities-understanding-the-unemployment-and-welfare-effects-of-the-china-shock/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Standard international trade models assume perfectly flexible prices and full employment. This paper introduces nominal rigidities (downward wage rigidity) into a quantitative trade model and asks how this changes the welfare gains from trade liberalization. The central finding is that standard flexible-price estimates overstate the welfare gains by approximately one-third: trade liberalization can generate unemployment in import-competing sectors when wages cannot fall, and the forgone output from these workers is a welfare cost that flexible-price models miss entirely. The paper calibrates the degree of downward wage rigidity to cross-country data on unemployment volatility and shows that the magnitude of the overstatement is robust across a range of calibrations. An analytical decomposition separates the allocative efficiency gains (which standard models capture) from the employment losses (which they miss), clarifying when the overstatement is large versus small.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>