<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Andrés Blanco | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/andres-blanco/</link><description>Andrés Blanco</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/andres-blanco/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Macroeconomics of Irreversibility</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/the-macroeconomics-of-irreversibility/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/the-macroeconomics-of-irreversibility/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research question.&lt;/strong&gt; How does partial capital irreversibility — arising from a wedge between the purchase price and the resale (discounted) price of capital — shape the persistence and amplitude of aggregate capital fluctuations? And what is the quantitative magnitude of the capital price wedge that is needed to simultaneously reconcile micro-level investment behavior with macroeconomic propagation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methodology.&lt;/strong&gt; Baley and Blanco build a continuous-time investment model for a continuum of firms facing (i) idiosyncratic productivity shocks (geometric Brownian motion), (ii) fixed capital adjustment costs proportional to productivity, and (iii) a capital price wedge ω, under which firms buy capital at price p and sell at p(1−ω). The key state variable is the log capital-productivity ratio k̂. The optimal policy takes the form of an inaction region with two distinct reset points — one for upsizing (k̂*₋) and one for downsizing (k̂*₊) — instead of the single reset point that arises without the wedge.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>