<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ana Cecília Fieler | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/ana-cecilia-fieler/</link><description>Ana Cecília Fieler</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/ana-cecilia-fieler/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Margins of Trade</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/the-margins-of-trade/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/the-margins-of-trade/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Research Question&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eaton and Fieler seek to reconcile two literatures that have advanced in parallel but remained at odds: (i) general equilibrium models of bilateral trade flows (the &amp;ldquo;gravity&amp;rdquo; tradition) and (ii) empirical work on the margins of trade — the decomposition of bilateral trade into the extensive margin (number of products traded), the quantity margin (physical volumes), and the unit-value (price) margin. Standard GE models cannot accommodate two of the most robust empirical regularities: that richer importing countries pay higher unit values for the same product, and that richer exporting countries charge higher unit values. The paper builds a framework that captures all three margins jointly while still delivering the standard gravity equation and the Arkolakis-Costinot-Rodriguez-Clare (ACR) welfare formula.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>