<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Alexandre Poirier | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/alexandre-poirier/</link><description>Alexandre Poirier</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/alexandre-poirier/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Effect of Omitted Variables on the Sign of Regression Coefficients</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/the-effect-of-omitted-variables-on-the-sign-of-regression-coefficients/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/the-effect-of-omitted-variables-on-the-sign-of-regression-coefficients/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Masten and Poirier demonstrate a previously unrecognized asymmetry in the coefficient stability literature: depending on how omitted variable bias is measured, it can be substantially easier for omitted variables to flip a regression coefficient&amp;rsquo;s sign than to drive it to zero. The paper focuses specifically on Oster (2019b), a widely used robustness framework with approximately 5,500 Google Scholar citations as of December 2025, and shows that Oster&amp;rsquo;s sensitivity parameter δ — commonly interpreted as the ratio of selection on unobservables to selection on observables — exhibits a structural problem when used to assess sign robustness.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>