<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Agneta Berge | Macro Paper Warehouse</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/agneta-berge/</link><description>Agneta Berge</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://macropaperwarehouse.com/authors/agneta-berge/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Staffing agencies and in-house bargaining</title><link>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/staffing-agencies-and-in-house-bargaining/</link><guid>https://macropaperwarehouse.com/papers/staffing-agencies-and-in-house-bargaining/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper asks whether a labor market with search-and-matching frictions and firms producing under decreasing returns to labor is better characterized by in-house hiring with intra-firm wage bargaining (Stole-Zwiebel) or by an alternative arrangement in which intermediaries — &amp;ldquo;staffing agencies&amp;rdquo; — search for and employ workers and then rent them to producing firms on a frictionless, perfectly competitive market. The paper&amp;rsquo;s second and central question is what happens when firms can choose their optimal combination of the two arrangements simultaneously.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>